User talk:El Comandante

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:El_Comandante.

This is the user talk page of El Comandante, where you can send messages and comments to El Comandante.

• Be polite.
• Be friendly.
• Assume good faith.
• No personal attacks.

• Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
• Put new text under old text.
• New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
• Click here to start a new topic.

Image:Pedra do sol.jpg

You placed a speedy delete tag on this image. However, you neglected to offer a rationale in the image page. The reasoning you offered in your edit summary "duplicate of Piedra do sol.jpg" is invalid, because the latter image does not exist.

Therefore, we have removed your speedy deletion request from the image. Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 18:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Cette image est utilizer sur beaucoups de wikis! Il n'est pas eligible pour speedy delete! Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 18:38, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Aussi: Il n'ya pas cette image: Image:Piedra de sol.jpg sur Commons!!!! Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 18:39, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Bien. Replacer cette image sur les autre wikis: Usage et nous pouvons supprimer cette image. Merci! Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 18:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Il y a un retarder avec le reportage. C'est maintenons une heure. Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 19:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Featured pictures candidates

Bonjour,

Pourriez-vous donner au moins un argument ayant motivé votre rejet des images Vitruvian.jpg, Death of Marat by David.jpg et Eugène Delacroix - La liberté guidant le peuple.jpg? Merci.

El ComandanteHasta ∞ 14:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Oui, je trouve que des reproductions de tableaux n'ont rien à faire en tant qu'image de qualité dans Wikipedia. Celles-ci devraient, à mon avis, faire preuve d'un minimum d'imagination, ce qui n'est évidemment pas le cas concernant des peintures et dessins archi-connus. Sinon, pourquoi ne pas reproduire toutes les oeuvres présentes dans les grands musées et en faire des images "featured". Encore, pour une sculpture, il y a l'angle de vue, l'éclairage qui peuvent distinguer une photo. Ici, rien, à part la stabilité de l'appareil et le choix d'une haute définition. Je préfère voter pour des illustrateurs qui font oeuvre créatrice. C'est mon avis. Il vaut ce qu'il vaut, mais je n'en changerai pas. Gérard Janot 18:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC) Tiens, et j'avais oublié de voter contre la Mort de Marat. Voilà qui est fait. Mais je précise que ce n'est pas contre vous. Je vote aussi contre la naissance de Vénus par Botticelle, pour les mêmes raisons.

Suite à votre réponse : c'est votre opinion - que je respecte - et ce n'est pas la mienne. Gérard Janot 22:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

PD copyright

Thanks for the link to the discussion. I see that Thuresson has come to the same conclusion as I did. But obviously it may be different in US. We have another demand too, if we use a picture, we must know from where we have taken it. We can not say, for instance, well, this picture is widely spread. We are obliged to know from where it was taken. Xauxa 23:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

A propos de "Featured_picture_candidates"

Bonjour El Comandante,

Je vois que tu es actif sur "Featured_picture_candidates" et en plus tu parles le français ce qui facilite ma demande ;-) Je remarque que des images de plus de 15 jours figures toujours dans la liste et ne sont pas classés ou supprimées! Qui doit faire cela? Et si cce n'est pas automatique, comment procéder? Que faire des images non sélectionnées? Et comment ranger les images sélectionnées? Merci d'avance pour les infos --Luc Viatour 07:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

L'utilisateur Lycaon à fait le nécessaire a+ :-) --Luc Viatour 12:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

An invitation

I noticed that you have reviewed FP pictures and are asking if you could assist in the developement of Commons:Quality Images. and associated pages Commons:Quality images candidates  ; Commons:Quality images guidelines thankyou Gnangarra 14:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

En retard

Pas de problème, mais maintenant c'est moi qui part en vacances, j'espère revenir avec pleins d'images pour Common ;-)

Image:Paris RER.svg

Salut !

J'ai modifié ce fichier (meilleure résolution pour l'aperçu avec Firefox) et rajouté une version PNG. Peux-tu revoir la page de vote ? (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_pictures_candidates/Paris_RER.svg) merci beaucoup ! ♦ Pabix ^ℹ 15:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Atribution problem

Please look at Image:Uxmal adivino 03.jpg which you uploaded without attribution to anybody else. It appears identical to de:Bild:Uxmal adivino 03.jpg, uploaded earlier to de:Wikipedia by User FJK71. Are you the same person as FJK71 on de:Wikipedia? -- Infrogmation 17:09, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• Also, Image:Uxmal Casa de las tortugas (Chac).jpg is clearly identical to my image en:Image:UxmalCornerChacMask.jpg, yet you credit it to yourself, a clear violation of GFDL. (BTW, you have also misidentified the building it comes from.) Please explain. -- Infrogmation 02:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I am listing both of these images on Commons:Deletion requests. -- Infrogmation 02:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:CopanTempleOfInscriptions.jpg

Pay attention to copyright

Image:CopanTempleOfInscriptions.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Iamunknown 16:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Re:Nahuatl in Mexico

Perdón por no contestar, pues, simplemente vectoricé el mapa en formato PNG. Si necesitas fuentes para verificar, puedes ver this page. --DavoO (talk) 23:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Murales Rivera - Markt in Tlatelolco 2.jpg

You placed a speedy delete tag on this image. I would like to know why. If murals of Diego Rivera are copyrighted, the whole category "Murales by Diego Rivera in the National Palace" has to be deleted plus numerous images in the Category "Diego Rivera". Please answer that question before deletion. Xenophon 21:20, 19 May 2009 ( UTC )

I didn't check if there were other reproductions of Diego Rivera's murales, but it seems that there are many others that have to be deleted. The reason is simply that Diego Rivera died less than 70 years ago, so the reproductions of his works are still copyrighted. But to be completely sure, I've asked it on the french version of Commons:Help desk. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 12:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer. Maybe one should take another aspect into consideration: Murales like that are quite often integral parts of public buildings. In fact the whole Category "Murals" consists of modern paintings at walls in public spaces. How far is a copy right of any artist valid in these cases? Is that a case of "freedom of panorama"? It seems to me that these problems need to be discussed - and solved - before any deletion. Regards Xenophon 17:30, 20 May 2009 ( UTC )

Like Sémhur recommended it to me on the Help desk, I've asked the deletion of all the files contained in the Category:Murales by Diego Rivera in the Palacio Nacional. You should expose your doubts there if you want to discuss about it. Regards. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 15:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

I don´t think that you have disturbed people for nothing. For me, lingering doubts about uploading murals in Mexico are now resolved, and I have still a lot of them to upload. So thank you for your intervention and don´t hesitate to clear up matters like this in the future. Regards Xenophon 19:12, 23 May 2009 ( UTC )

Route de Cortès

Bonjour,

j'avais trouvé ça dans la cartothèque de l'Université d'Austin (Texas). Le lien est ici. Après, quelle est la bonne route, c'est un autre problème....

A+ historicair (talk) 17:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Merci pour la réponse. L'ouvrage a l'air ancien, donc pas forcément très fiable, contrairement à celle utilisée par Yavidaxiu, qui est l'œuvre de spécialistes contemporains. Que penses-tu d'indiquer, sur la page, de ta carte, non seulement le lien que tu viens de me donner, mais aussi le nom de l'ouvrage et un lien direct vers la carte de Yavidaxiu expliquant qu'elle est plus fiable car plus récente? El ComandanteHasta ∞ 14:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Pas de souci, je te laisse faire, j'ai pris ma retraite de Wiki historicair (talk) 21:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Voilà, c'est fait. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 20:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Human sacrifice (Codex Mendoza).jpg

Hello. I changed File:Human sacrifice (Codex Mendoza).jpg from a speedy delete to "dupe" and filed a "universal replace" command, since the image is used in multiple Wikipedias and the other version should be substituted in articles before this version is deleted. Thank you, Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 16:44, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

OK. I just uploaded the file another time with a correct name. What should I do now? El ComandanteHasta ∞ 16:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Un expert en civilisations précolombiennes mexicaines ?

Hola El Comandante !

Je t'ai vu passer dans ma liste de suivi pour la recatégorisation d'une photo d'une statue aztèque exposée au Musée national d'anthropologie de Mexico. J'ai uploadé sur commons un certain nombre de photos d'objets archéologiques de musées mexicains à la suite d'un voyage ; certaines de ces photos mériteraient un affinement de catégorisation et de description. J'ai pris le maximum de notes, mais, non-hispanophone, je suis certainement passé à côté de beaucoup de trucs. Au vu de tes contributions, tu m'as l'air plutôt compétent dans ce domaine, donc, si l'envie t'en prend, tu peux toujours jeter un coup d'œil à User:Éclusette/Mexique et notamment à la Category:Amparo Museum. Salutations wikimédiennes, Éclusette (talk) 23:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token c86c47f96043b692dc8a96eed22e3955

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 2f63d0299280dd6429e2a2ad1a560706

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Category:Cong

Cong has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jerzystrzelecki (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Pirámide de la isla de Jaina.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pirámide de la isla de Jaina.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pirámide de la isla de Jaina.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

—LX (talk, contribs) 12:49, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

The source provided in the image description shows the license (bottom right). I removed your superfluous warning. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 13:50, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

No, according to the source, the file is licensed under the terms of {{Cc-by-nd}} (which is not an accepted license on Commons – not {{Cc-by-sa}}. I've restored the problem tag.

Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started, as this makes conversations easier to follow. I am watching this page, so I will see responses made here. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:55, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, my bad. I read CC-BY-SA, but it is CC-BY-ND. You can delete it. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 13:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

réponse à la suppression de File:Nahuatl in Mexico-fr.svg

Voir http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fylip22#File:Nahuatl_in_Mexico-fr.svg pour la réponse à la suppression de l'image File:Nahuatl in Mexico-fr.svg Fylip22 (talk) 20:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

TUSC token 01f60a60d4a7f91bd9edd4587754d376

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Aztec Empire (orthographic projection)

Before reverting or modify this map, Sémhur should discuss on talk page, there wasn't a previous talk before his uploadling.--Giggette (talk) 16:14, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Without any reliable source to support my point of view? really? and do you?, your "reliable source" is just about the provinces tributary of the triple alliance by the user Yavidaxiu (File:Provincias tributarias de la Triple Alianza (s. XVI).svg), don't you have enough?. --Giggette (talk) 21:16, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Doesn't make sense?, I see, well, your only two sources from "Arqueología Mexicana" and "Frances Berdan" are only the original provinces tributary of the triple alliance when the aztec empire was founded (Mexico-Tenochtitlan, Texcoco, Tlacopan), but all the references I gave you, they show the maximun expansion of the territory the aztec empire in 1519 after many declines, for example, "Atzcapotzalco". Now it makes sense?, it's like "European Union", original created by Inner Six countries in 1951, so then you'll show the first territory extension of the EU if tomorrow won't be dissolved?. --Giggette (talk) 02:46, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

No. These two maps show the aztec empire in 1519, not when the last Excan Tlatoloyan was founded. Moreover, Azcapotzalco was conquered and included in the Mexica triple alliance when the aztec empire was founded... El ComandanteHasta ∞ 07:21, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not edit war

---

You currently appear to be participating in an edit war (at File:Aztec Empire (orthographic projection).svg). Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.

Addition

Please stop of adding "your another version" to my uploading [1], [2], your orthographic projection is a completely different map without verification. Thank you. --Giggette (talk) 17:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

No. Your uploading is NOT your propriety, it's Commons propriety! As a user of Commons, I can add whatever alternative version I want to that page, to help other users to navigate between files. Even if it doesn't please you. You're not the owner of any Commons file or page. El ComandanteHasta ∞ 21:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not edit war

---

You currently appear to be participating in an edit war (at File:Aztec_Empire_ME_(orthographic_projection).svg). Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.

-- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

No personal attacks

Personal attacks do not help make a point. Please you should calm down. --Giggette (talk) 18:18, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Change your signature

Hi, please change your signature and remove its image, your signature violates Commons policy, images of any kind must not be used in signatures.  ■ MMXX ^talk 19:51, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 1 day

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 day for the following reason: Repeated personal attacks on another user after warnings.. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

--Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Wow. That's impressive. Saying that someone lied when he irrefutably lied (there and there, as Yavidaxiu himself complained) is a personal attack for you? No, it's not. It's a fact. Did you notice that you didn't answer any of my previous questions about what behaviour is acceptable or not? If you think that the vandals are those who try to stop POV pushers, and not the POV pushers, well, I just hope you're one of a kind and that other administrators are more lucid than you. El Comandante (talk) 22:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

We discourage attacks on other editors because it is difficult to discuss the substance of a matter when people are angry, defensive, and the like. Please focus on the content, not the character or motivations of other editors. If you must discuss another editor's work, English includes a variety of alternatives to "lie", e.g., "mistaken", "in error", "misinformed", etc. Such words are less likely to cause offense than "lie" which implies willful deception. But generally, it is more effective to avoid such discussions. Yavidaxiu says, "También pediría que tuvieras en cuenta la fiabilidad de las fuentes que ofrece Giggette: las políticas de la wikipedia señalan que los sitios autopublicados, los blogs y las enciclopedias no son fuentes confiables, por lo que no pueden emplearse para referenciar las ediciones en los artículos." I'm not fluent in that language, but I think Yavidaxiu is questioning the quality of Giggette's sources. That is acceptable. Please see fr:Wikipédia:Pas d'attaque personnelle for an explanation in French. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

It seems that you haven't read the discussions about the two maps concerned. I've spent a lot of time, during more than seven weeks, trying to make Giggette understand why File:Aztec Empire ME (orthographic projection).svg (Keepscases' undocumented map, probably based on a Maunus' map, that she wants to protect and promote even now that she knows that Maunus himself concede that his map was an unreliable original work and that it would be better to replace it by Yavidaxiu's map) is not reliable (because not based on reliable sources), and why File:Aztec Empire (orthographic projection).svg (Sémhur's map, based on Yavidaxiu's map) is much more reliable, and therefore, superseeds the other one. But, as she did before on spanish, english and french Wikipedias (where she has tired and upset local experts of Mesoamerica with her POV pushing and inability to discuss), she appeared unable to understand and admit the difference between reliable and unreliable sources. She also appeared unable to admit her full ignorance of the subject. She also appeared dishonnest, refusing to answer to the questions contradicting her POV (after my first question, or later, about lahistoriaconmapas, she NEVER answered), and misquoting what Yavidaxiu said, always to discredit Sémhur's map and protect what she seems to consider now "her" map.

Recap of the situation :

1. in 2010, Keepscases published the first version of the map, probably based on Maunus' map File:Aztecempirelocation.png (same borders, same color).
2. One month later, Sémhur uploaded a new version, based on Yavidaxiu's map File:Provincias tributarias de la Triple Alianza (s. XVI).svg. Why? Because I've asked him to, because we needed a reliable orthographic projection for this other map, and because Maunus' map didn't quoted its source, while Yavidaxiu's quoted a very recent and specialized source, so it's much more reliable.
3. More than three years later, Giggette reverted Sémhur's upload without any explanation.
4. After some edit warring between Giggette (still without any explanation) and Sémhur (who explained that his map was supported by a reliable source), discussion started on Sémhur's talk page (see the complete discussion there). Sémhur asked me on my talk page on french Wikipedia to help him to explain to Giggette why we had to replace Keepscases' map by a more reliable one. So, I asked to Giggette why she thought that Sémhur's map was not the maximal extension territory of the aztec domination in territories but only the "Aztec Triple Alliance" (a phrase that doesn't make sense because mesoamericanists use "Aztec Empire" and "Triple Alliance" as synonyms), but she didn't want to answer. Instead, she tried to produce new sources to support Keepscases' map, but none was valid (because all were randomly picked from blogs, created by unidentified authors, according to an unidentified methodology and unidentified primary sources).
5. (to be continued)
6. Since April 27, Giggette has extended her POV pushing to the template {{Grey-green orthographic projections maps}}, still refusing to concede that Keepscases/Maunus map is unreliable because not supported and contradicted by reliable sources...

El Comandante (talk) 22:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

 Comment Well, same here I've spent a lot of time, during more than seven weeks, trying to make understand why Sémhur must have uploaded another file with his reliable sources and then have consensus on Wikipedias about the change of the original map uploaded and used since 10 January 2010 by Keepscases, because Sémhur and El Comandante did not have a prior consensus to the talk page to change it. That's why I reverted it to the original version [3] and suggested upload another file and so I added the original map to the template {{Grey-green orthographic projections maps}} as it was since 10 January 2010 by Keepscases. So now tell me, is that a reason to insult me​​? if one map has more reliable sources than the other I think it is not a reason to replace it on COMMONS, you have should upload another map and have consensus on Wikipedias not here if you don't want to have friendly changes. --Giggette (talk) 02:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

1.- [4] by the Department of History by Ian Mladjov, University of Michigan.

2.- Aztec Warfare: Imperial Expansion and Political Control by Ross Hassig, University of Oklahoma Press, according a user

3.- [5] Encyclopædia Britannica 1994

4.- As such more sources [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]

I was always polite with you but you insulted me, address the content of the image, not the person, I hope you can't understand. The original name of the map should almost certainly stay with the image that was originally uploaded it. --Giggette (talk) 02:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Oh, yes, sure, it was just a neutral way for you to preserve from deletion a file amongst others, right? That's why you tried to impose it to all Wikipedias, and now on the template {{Grey-green orthographic projections maps}}? You can't hide your POV pushing : your mexican nationalist propaganda is obvious, to make believe that Aztec empire was larger than it was really according to the analysis of all the primary sources by specialists. El Comandante (talk) 08:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

And I note that you're continuing to deliberately misquote other users, pretending that Ross Hassig's Aztec Warfare supports Keepscases map according to Maunus, while you know that Maunus himself conceded that there was no map of the Aztec empire in that book, and that he made an unreliable original research creating his map on the basis of different maps of journeys of Aztec rulers conquests. Moreover, you also know that Maunus himself recommended the use of Sémhur's map, but you're trying to hide it too. El Comandante (talk) 08:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

My mexican nationalist propaganda?, what's wrong with you against me?, racism?, enough for me. --Giggette (talk) 12:31, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Racism? LOL. Not at all : I'm of mexican origin. I just say that if you are doing whatever you can to impose to everyone a map clearly unreliable and superseded by a very much more reliable one, it is for some reason, and the obvious one is because you want to promote an idealized vision of the power and the importance of the Aztec Empire, like all mexican nationalists are used to do (cf. D. A. Brading, Los Orígenes Del Nacionalismo Mexicano). El Comandante (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Mural pbm.jpg

Hello, If the licens is not correct (-70 years) add a other license or nomitnate it for deletion. Greetings--Steinsplitter (talk) 14:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

The correct license is {{FoP-Mexico}}, and it's already published. For more explanations, please read Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#FoP_Mexico. El Comandante (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

FoP-Mexico-Template is (de jure) probably not a license.--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Have you read the discussion I pointed out? Because it seems very clear that FoP-Mexico is the closest license we have to explain that Mexican copyright law allows reproduction of that painting (which is NOT in the public domain, so not PD-Art). Moreover, the reproduction of 2D-art does not generate any new copyright, as Commons:2D copying explains it. So, no other license than FoP-Mexico can be applied. Why do you say it's probably not a license? El Comandante (talk) 15:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, i hav read the discussion. If you think this is a correct license... ok ;-), Greetings--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:15, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Giggette

Hola El Comandante.

Viendo en-2, es-3 en tu Babel opto por escribirte en español por tener más nivel.

He procedido a cerrar Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Giggette otorgando una solución lo más imparcial posible, concrétamente la propuesta por Penyulap.

He separado el mapa en 2 archivos distintos, por favor, evitad las guerras de ediciones y denuncias mutuas en COM:AN y que cada uno utilice el que más le guste. De esto te informo tanto a ti como a ella (Giggette).

Espero que podáis convivir ambos con los archivos y no tengamos que tomar decisiones drásticas (bloqueos, protecciónes, ...) ningún administrador, prefiero evitarlo. Recuerda, aquí estamos todos de forma voluntaria y gratis, mantengamos el buen ambiente y ayudémonos unos a otros.

Un saludo. --Alan ^(talk) 13:37, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Nahuatl in Mexico.svg

Referencia agregada a la ficha. Saludos. --Addicted04 (talk) 00:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/El Comandante⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear El Comandante,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Bob Kane.jpg

File:Bob Kane.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Mural del Gernika.jpg

File:Mural del Gernika.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leptictidium (talk) 11:28, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)