User talk:Sodabottle

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Copyrighted images

[edit]

Hi, please beware that all images from India taken 1936 and after are still copyrighted in the U.S. For a description that points this out check Balayogini 1937film.jpg. Works from 1935 or earlier are free as I pointed out here: Nandanar 1935 film.jpg. There is no consensus currently about images still copyrighted in the U.S., but I wanted to let you know that they are considered problematic. Regards Hekerui (talk) 08:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning. I have added PD-India tags for them. Also the use of those images comes under fair use categories for both Indian and US Copyright laws. --Sodabottle (talk) 08:41, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Sodabottle!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Sodabottle. You have new messages at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Indian_Passport.jpg.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 15:50, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi Sodabottle. I am extremely sorry for the mistake did by me. I truly trusted the work (CM JJ image) and judged since it was there in commons, it must be legal enough to re-produce it to other articles. But as you very rightly pointed out, it is clearly taken from web. I accept the mistake and sorry for any inconveniences on this matter. Honestly I thought since the image was there for almost more than 2 months (I guess from April), and no one found that for this long it made me to do. In future let me be more more careful in transforming images to articles. Thanks and sorry again. Do not feel worst. ---- Ungal Vettu Pillai (talk) 08:15, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of interest to you, as the images are on ta.wiki and being transferred again. You participated in the deletion disc here. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 07:08, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have stopped the transfers. Also the transferrer this time (after being informed by me of the problem) has created a separate cat for these images and put up a note not to transfer to commons and to verify and delete the images. So wont happen again. Will take care of those images in the coming weeks in ta wiki.--Sodabottle (talk) 01:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 0d1647cb391636e3641f3df90af6e9e4

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Movenpick_tower,_Doha_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Quan (talk) 09:02, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk back

[edit]
Hello, Sodabottle. You have new messages at Wikitanvir's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

— Tanvir | Talk ] 14:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pongal_pai_-_side_one.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 08:19, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pongal_pai_side_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kiran Gopi (talk) 08:21, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:File:Nature look.jpg

[edit]

Any educational value for this image, or it is a random upload? --Kiran Gopi (talk) 03:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

looks like a personal photo. I see no educational value "at present". But i am reluctant to comment delete, because who knows what it might be used for illusrating. After a few weeks, we will be leaving messages for all uploaders asking for more detailed description on their uploads similar to this. We will probably doing some out of scope taggings after that.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:11, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) --Kiran Gopi (talk) 04:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Sodabottle. You have new messages at Kiran Gopi's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

can i upload pondicherry photos !

[edit]

can i upload pondicherry photos ! because in the rules, they specified it as tamil nadu !!

Images from Pollachi Nasan's thamizham.net

[edit]

How we can make sure that the images uploaded from thamizham.net are PD-India.? --Kiran Gopi (talk) 11:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pollachi Nasan runs one of the biggest digitisation projects in Tamil (Thamizham.net). He digitises print material that has gone out of copyright and those donated to him by the authors and heirs of authors (Many of the authors donate their works that have gone out of print to him to save them). Even then to be sure Karthickbala is uploading images only of those who died before 1930s. The dates of death of the subjects are given below the photos themselves. Safely well beyond the 60 year period for PD India.--Sodabottle (talk) 11:24, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why I am asking again is commons needs a solid proof of the original source (where it was first published), lack of first published date so-many images got deleted from here. For avoiding a mass deletion it is better to keep the original published source. Please find some related DR. 1, more over some of the images not photographs for eg . --Kiran Gopi (talk) 12:15, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"solid proof" of 19th century publication can never be obtained to everyone's satisfaction. If i offer a offline source, then someone might ask for "visible proof" :-). Thanks for pointing me to that DR. Looks very difficult to satisfy (i know where some of the images come from - have seen the source books in pdf format within the same site, but have to search (not indexed), download and take for each image) . Didnt know things were such bad here :-). Instead of spending time dealing with commons copyright paranoia i will just tell him to upload to local wikipedias under FUR . It is indeed ironic when flickrwashing is given much AGF and such images are put to the screw.--Sodabottle (talk) 12:29, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Even though some images got deleted from here, please encourage people to upload images to commons with proper source. That will reduce re-uploading of images and save the server space. I understood your emotion. I know it is very difficult to find a source for images published in 1900's :( . Some DR's we can't do anything. :( --Kiran Gopi (talk) 13:34, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category

[edit]

Thirunallar Dharbaranyeeswarar Temple and Tank.jpg‎ - strictly speaking is not in Tamil Nadu, isn't it? It should be Puducherry... I don't see a category for Temple tanks in Puducherry, so I have left it for now. VasuVR (talk, contribs) 10:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes. Thanks for catching that. will create the new category and change.--Sodabottle (talk) 12:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Good to see you here, much less interuptions :)Kanatonian (talk) 20:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Justice Party 1930s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thuresson (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Justice Party 1920s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thuresson (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Free images in ta wiki

[edit]

A while ago, I moved almost everyone of the 4000 free images ml wiki had to Commons. Now everyone at ml wiki uploads free images directly to Commons. Is it the same in ta wiki? Just curious. If there are pending images in ta wiki thats awaiting a transfer to commons, why not organize a drive to move them all here? I can help too. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:40, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The current ta wiki user base (one that is active since 2010), overwhelmingly uploads to commons now. We have popularised uploading to commons there. Most of the free images date from before that. And a lot of that needs clean up - there are copyvios, images without proper licensing, fairuse images tagged wrongly etc. We have been working on the backlog for a few months now and have made good progress. Currently i lack the energy and time to mount a proper cleanup drive (wiki exhaustion :-)). I am supposed to organise one as part of the current media contest, but couldnt do so properly (we cleaned up a couple of thousand images without coordination and fizzled out after that). I plan to mount a properly planned cleanup drive in a couple of months (once i recover from the contest exhaustion :-). Will definitely ask for your help then. :-).--Sodabottle (talk) 14:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Tamil Wiki Media Contest is over

[edit]
Tamil Wiki Media Contest English | മലയാളം | தமிழ் | +/−
Dear Sodabottle,

Thank you for contributing to Tamil Wiki Media Contest and sharing your files with the whole world. Results of the contest can be viewed here. You are very welcome to keep uploading files, even though the contest is over. The contest was very successful with more than 15,000 media files uploaded. Nearly 8000 of them are being used in various wikiprojects in different languages. You can add your images, audio and video files to various Wikiprojects like Tamil & English Wikipedias and the Tamil Wiktionary.

Kind regards,

the Tamil Wiki Community
--Sodabottle (talk) 06:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Underlying lk (talk) 04:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Commerical bank, Sidra, ICT, Doha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Underlying lk (talk) 14:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:1937 Madras Legislative Assembly Rajagopalachari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abimanyu 1948 film.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 20:27, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


File:1 pice coins British India 1943,1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

THAuzhavan (talk) 09:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:MGR Mathialagan Anna Rajaji Karunanidhi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

~AntanO4task (talk) 01:55, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 19:28, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 19:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beverly Hills Tower, Doha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 15:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beverly Hills Tower, Doha2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 15:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dolphin Energy Tower, Doha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

B dash (talk) 16:16, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Annadurai, Chennai Airport.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Annadurai, Chennai Airport.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:12, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buildings, diplomatic quarter, doha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rasgas1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doha Bank, Al Corniche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:13, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google translation project - Tamil Wikipedia.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 159.86.134.134.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 11:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]